On-Chain Whale Tracking: Accumulation or Distribution?
Original Article Title: "Link Whale Behavior - Who's Buying, Who's Selling? Data Reveals the Truth!"
Original Article Author: Murphy, On-Chain Data Analyst
After receiving comments from friends in the community, requesting an analysis of Link's data, as the leader in oracles and a high market cap altcoin, Link's on-chain data is much richer than what we have seen with ENA or PEPE. Due to my lack of in-depth research into the project's technical ecosystem, I can only approach this from a data perspective and cannot provide a comprehensive research report.
Alright, in this edition, let's talk about Link. Our starting point is Link's large wallets; observing whale behavior is a key focus of on-chain data analysis. For Link, we must also face the reality that whales have already conducted large-scale profit-taking from December 2024 to January 2025.
(Figure 1)
As shown in Figure 1, every time the Link price experiences a rapid increase, wallets holding 10k to 1M Link (high-net-worth group) and wallets holding>1M Link (whale group) both see very high peaks of realized profits. Additionally, in each major trend, the 10k to 1M group tends to sell off in large volumes first, followed by the>1M group starting to cash out, leading to a subsequent price peak and decline.
For example:
1. In November-December 2023, the trend was led by the 10k to 1M group, with Link priced around $16; in February 2024, the trend was led by the>1M group, with Link priced around $18;
2. In December 2024, once again, the trend started with the 10k to 1M group cashing out intensively at Link prices between $22-$29; subsequently, in January 2025, the>1M group started cashing out intensively, with Link priced around $26.
It is evident that these sell-offs occurred near interim highs. When the market cannot absorb such a large distribution of chips, a peak naturally forms.

(Figure 2)
Looking at the current distribution of circulating chip holdings, the amount of Link held by whales (>1M) is steadily decreasing. In the bear market of May 2022, whales held 786m Link, and by March 2025, this number had decreased to 669m. This indicates that more Link is moving to relatively smaller wallets, meaning chip concentration is decreasing.
Looking back at historical data, from 2018 to 2021, Link was in a high chip concentration phase. After May 2022, the chip concentration has been on a declining trend, and it is unknown whether this means that Link is gradually transitioning from the previous "strong market maker control" mode to a "community consensus" mode.

(Figure 3)
The three lines in Figure 3 represent:
1. Line1 (deep green) - Average turnover cost of the high net worth group; currently at $15;
2. Line2 (black) - Link-RPC, i.e., overall chip average turnover cost; currently at $12;
3. Line3 (light green) - Average turnover cost of the whale group; currently at $10;
The current Link price is below Line1 but above Link-RPC, indicating that there are still a significant number of chips in a floating profit state, keeping the overall turnover cost above the average. In this respect, Link outperforms the data performance of most altcoins. For example, as we saw in the previous period with ENA, the current price is already below ENA-RPC.
During the bear market consolidation phase, the price of Link has always been below Line3, meaning that at this time, the whale group is on average in a floating loss state, and each rebound encounters resistance at the Link-RPC line. When the price rises above Line1, it means that Link has sounded the horn of the bull market's major uptrend.
From August 2024 to November, Link also experienced a long bull market retracement period. It can be seen that the price has always remained above Line3, so whenever it touches the whale group's cost line, the selling pressure decreases. Therefore, if we assume that this bull market cycle has not yet ended, when the Link price is below Link-RPC but above Line3, it may be the limit of the retracement ($10-$12).
Once the price falls below Line3 and the rebound cannot break through Link-RPC, there is a risk of entering a long-term bear market.
(Figure 4)
Finally, let's take a look at the chip structure changes of Link in the past three years and recently. During the consolidation period from November 2022 to October 2023, a large chip accumulation zone was formed around $6-$7. By March 2024, when the Link price surged to $20, this chip accumulation zone gradually disappeared, indicating that the chips accumulated at the lower levels were gradually sold off at the higher levels.
Afterwards, following a price retracement in July 2024 to November 2024, LINK continued to consolidate, forming a new accumulation zone with an average cost of around $12-$13. A portion of these holdings were gradually sold off as the price surged to $26-$28 between December 2024 and January 2025.
However, two whale groups' positions are worth noting: one group accumulated 39 million LINK around October 2024 at a cost of around $12, while another group also accumulated 17 million LINK around November 2024 at a similar cost. Regardless of the price surging to $28 and then dropping back to $12, these two whale groups did not sell their holdings; instead, they continued to accumulate at different times.
The former group increased their holdings in a phased and rhythmic manner; they added substantially to their position in December 2024 (at prices of $17 and $26), January 2025 (at $25), and significantly increased their holdings after the bounce from $12 on March 15, 2025. They currently hold a total of 66 million LINK with an average cost of $14.6;
The latter group consistently increased their holdings; they added to their position in December 2024 to January 2025 (as the price dropped from $29 to $19), February 2025 (as the price dropped from $25 to $14), and at the low point on March 11, 2025. They currently hold 21 million LINK with an average cost of $16.
This behavior indicates that these whale groups are patient long-term holders unlikely to sell at the current price level. Therefore, the $14.6 and $16 levels are not resistance but rather chip support. If the LINK price continues to decline, it is possible that these two whale groups may continue to accumulate.
Combining the aforementioned information, with Line 1 at $15 and Line 3 at $10, the collective accumulation by whale groups suggests that any pullback in the LINK bull market is likely to find a temporary bottom within that range.
My sharing is for learning and communication purposes only, not as investment advice
You may also like

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?

Vitalik 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Carnival Speech Transcript: We do not compete on speed; security and decentralization are the core

In-depth Analysis of RAVE Events: Short Squeeze, Crash, and Quantitative Financial Models of Liquidity Manipulation


