Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?
Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher
As the overall decline of the crypto market continues, the asset management scale of almost all crypto VCs is shrinking, and the industry is entering a brutal clearing cycle. However, against this backdrop, a crypto venture capital fund established for less than five years has become a true exception, emerging with an independent growth curve amidst the contraction.
According to a batch of undisclosed financial disclosure documents from crypto VCs obtained by a Fortune reporter from the U.S. SEC last week, data shows that the assets under management (AUM) of leading institutions such as Paradigm, Pantera, a16z crypto, and Multicoin are all shrinking by 2025, with Multicoin experiencing a reduction of over half.
The only fund bucking the trend is Haun Ventures, a venture capital fund established only four years ago, whose AUM has grown from an initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion by 2025.
In the bleak crypto market, this is by no means just luck. Last year, market news indicated that Haun Ventures was close to completing a new round of fundraising for $1 billion, reflecting that Haun Ventures and its founder Katie Haun's unique investment strategy has been validated by the market and LPs, positioning it among the top VCs.
Distinctive Founder Style and Background
Haun Ventures' differences were evident from the start.
Founder Katie Haun is not a typical crypto investor. She served as a U.S. federal prosecutor for many years, engaged in financial crime investigations for over a decade, and created the U.S. government's first cryptocurrency task force. In 2018, she became the first female partner at a16z and co-led the fund's cryptocurrency fund, also joining the Coinbase board, thus combining policy vision, institutional resources, and practical experience.
This background gives her an understanding of the crypto industry that is not solely based on "technical potential" or "market size," but rather from the perspectives of compliance boundaries, systemic risks, and institutional embedding capabilities. The impact of this background is not overt but is profound enough.
It is noteworthy that Haun Ventures is one of only two funds in the crypto industry named after its founder, reflecting the fund's distinctive founder-led style. The other VC named after its founder is a16z.
In its early days, Haun Ventures was not without flaws and also stumbled during market booms. Looking back at the investment records, Haun Ventures once focused on NFTs as a key investment area, investing in at least four NFT projects such as Opensea, Autograph, ZORA, and Highlight in the first half of 2022.
However, as the bubble around concepts like NFTs quickly burst, Haun Ventures demonstrated a strong ability to correct and iterate, rapidly retracting its focus from the second half of 2022, significantly reducing its frequency of investments, and responding to market downturns with extreme caution.
According to [RootData](https://www.rootdata.com/zh/Investors/detail/Haun Ventures?k=MjQ2) data, in the second half of 2022 and throughout 2023, Haun Ventures publicly disclosed participation in only six financing rounds over these 18 months, averaging one investment every three months.
As of June 2023, Haun Ventures partner Rosenblum stated in an interview that the company's investments are almost evenly split between digital tokens and traditional equity, having allocated about 30% of its funds to around twenty projects, including publicly traded and highly liquid tokens. These tokens include well-known cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as small-cap tokens related to projects.
At that time, Bitcoin's price hovered in the range of $15,000 to $30,000 for an extended period, later peaking at $126,000 in 2025, which brought Haun Ventures considerable investment returns, largely offsetting losses in areas like NFTs and becoming a crucial cornerstone for its growth.
Key Transformation
Starting in 2024, Haun Ventures' investment strategy began to show a clear shift, with a focus on payment, developer platform, and other B-end solution companies.
At that time, these directions were not particularly attractive; they lacked explosive growth stories and were difficult to generate market sentiment in a short period. However, they precisely hit the critical point of the industry's transition from speculation to practicality.
In that year, Haun Ventures invested in nearly ten B-end companies, including the stablecoin payment platform Bridge, crypto-native infrastructure platform Conduit, crypto protocol economic security solution Chaos Labs, Solana development platform Helius, and crypto payment platform BVNK.
In terms of investment style, Haun Ventures particularly favors leading investments. According to RootData statistics, in its publicly participated 39 financing rounds, it led 22 times, with a leading rate exceeding 56%, ranking first among top VCs. This reflects Haun Ventures' extraordinary confidence in its investment portfolio and its willingness to support high-potential early-stage projects with substantial funding.
Looking back now, payment has become the sector with the highest valuation premium and the clearest exit path in the crypto field. Haun Ventures' early positioning, combined with its consistent leading style, has yielded considerable investment exit returns.
Since October 2024, more than five of Haun Ventures' portfolio companies have been acquired, with several payment companies achieving high multiples of returns. For example, Haun Ventures led the stablecoin development platform Bridge at a valuation of $200 million, which was ultimately acquired at a valuation exceeding $1.1 billion. Haun Ventures also led the crypto payment platform BVNK at a valuation of $750 million, which was eventually acquired at a valuation exceeding $1.8 billion.
In an environment where exit channels for crypto assets are increasingly narrowing and secondary market liquidity is highly concentrated among top players, Haun Ventures has demonstrated the feasibility of another path: investing in companies that can solve real payment pain points and possess compatibility with traditional finance through equity, achieving high multiple exits through acquisitions, which is more capital-efficient than holding a bunch of illiquid tokens.
From chasing the hot NFT trend to balancing allocations between tokens and equity, and then focusing on B-end payments and infrastructure, Haun Ventures' evolutionary path is a microcosm of the shift from speculation to value orientation in crypto VCs. Katie Haun's compliance background, the fund's rapid correction ability, cautious investment pace, and high leading investment ratio strategy, combined with a precise grasp of real applications and exit paths, have collectively built a moat that transcends cycles.
As the industry bubble recedes, institutions relying on stories and leveraged expansion shrink, while Haun Ventures, grounded in compliance and stability, emerges as the most certain winner in the crypto winter, also pointing the entire VC industry toward the next stage of survival and growth logic.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.




