Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap
Content Compilation: Odaily Planet Daily
On April 20, 2026, the China Hong Kong Web3 Carnival kicked off at the China Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Center. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin delivered the keynote speech, diving deep into Ethereum's ultimate vision as a "world computer" and the hardcore roadmap for the next five years.
Here is the full text of the speech:
Good morning, everyone! Where is the Ethereum protocol heading? I believe that over the past few years, we have witnessed significant changes in both theoretical and ecosystem domains. At the same time, we have also witnessed many revolutions occurring outside the Ethereum ecosystem, including the infinite possibilities brought by artificial intelligence, the imminent realization of quantum computing, and progress in formal verification, cryptography, zero-knowledge proofs, and other areas.
I believe that one of the important things we have been doing is rethinking what is truly meaningful: What is the meaning of using Ethereum? Why Ethereum? What are its features? What makes it necessary for a decentralized network to have these features?
For example, how to incorporate these new technologies into our existing Ethereum protocol and the plans for the next five years? What is the purpose of Ethereum? I believe it has two main functions:
First, Ethereum is like a public noticeboard. It is a space where applications can post messages, and everyone can see the content and order of the messages. These messages can be of any content, such as transactions, hash values, encrypted data, and many other things. In fact, there are many opportunities for applications to use Ethereum as a place to publish data, while using other types of protocols to interpret this data (i.e., decrypt the data and perform computations on the data).
Secondly, it is a computer. Essentially, Ethereum allows you to have shared digital objects controlled by code. These digital objects can be many things; they can be assets, ERC-20 tokens, NFTs, whose meanings are not limited to the theoretical level (ENS is an example), and can even refer to control over organizations (DAO is an example). You can do many things, so both of these are extremely valuable. For dapps-4607">decentralized applications, Ethereum ensures autonomous security, verifiability, fair participation, and brings all users together.
“Self-sovereignty” essentially means that as a user, you can participate, validate, and ensure your own security, all based on your own infrastructure. You don't need to trust any third party to run Ethereum, and you don't need to trust any third party outside of Ethereum if you don't want to.
Therefore, verifiability and the ability to validate ensure that the chain runs correctly and that everything that happens is verifiable, while also being able to guarantee the rights of anyone and the right to actually publish information to a bulletin board. So, this is key; we should view Ethereum as a technical module and think about all the applications this technical foundation can support. The most interesting applications will be products that combine on-chain and off-chain. This includes ENS, prediction markets, and more.
Prediction markets have on-chain components (assets created for each event that can be traded) and off-chain components (one of which is an oracle). Sometimes the design of prediction markets or the matching of trade orders happens on-chain, and there are also privacy considerations.
For example, for decades people have been researching cryptographic protocols to simplify or achieve secure electronic voting. Many such protocols often rely on a public bulletin board where people can publish information. In this case, they are encrypted votes to ensure everyone can participate. Anything related to privacy must include an on-chain part (for data publication) and an off-chain part (for data interpretation).
If it's about interpreting data, then it must be done off-chain through a private protocol. So, we've talked a lot about Layer 2 (L2). In my view, to determine which type of L2 makes sense, you first need to understand which type does not make sense: if you just replicate Ethereum, scale it up by 100 times, make it more centralized, and that's it, it's meaningless. I think meaningful L2 is: you start looking at various applications, asking what off-chain components they need. What do they need besides L1? And then you go build those things.
What does this mean for Ethereum? We need to scale data; we need to be able to publish more data on-chain. PeerDAS introduced in the recent hard fork last year has addressed this to some extent, but we still need to further this. Scalability of computation is also essential because as part of the Ethereum chain, computational scalability can help different applications interact with each other without intermediaries.
If you visit the roadmap website (roadmap.org), you can find a roadmap designed for the next five years. The protocol's core goals in the short term: one is short-term scalability with continued efforts to increase the Gas limit; the other is the beginning of zkEVM implementation. zkEVM allows Ethereum to scale further, perform more complex computations, while still making it easy to verify on-chain information. There's also early preparation for the post-quantum era. We've been thinking about quantum computing for years, recognizing it as a threat and having some measures in place. Soon, in the short term, we will enhance Ethereum's quantum security and refine the entire roadmap.
For example, in the end, all parts of Ethereum will achieve full post-quantum security and be very efficient. Additionally, improvements will be made to the block building process and enhanced privacy support. Therefore, in the short term, many EIP proposals for scaling will be applied in the next phase. For instance, Block Access List can enable parallelization, Gas repricing can enhance efficiency, and increase the Gas limit making it more secure.
ePBS (proposer and builder separation) makes Ethereum block validation more secure even with longer block times and enhances the ability to download node states. There is also EIP-8141 (Account Abstraction Proposal), which is very simple yet powerful. Basically, a transaction is a series of calls where one call could be validation and another could be execution. This allows Ethereum to easily achieve native support for smart contract wallets, used for third-party payment transactions, supporting post-quantum signature algorithms and privacy protocols.
Therefore, this makes Ethereum more versatile, supporting many functions. Post-quantum signature algorithms do exist and have been around for 20 years. We know what they are and how to build them. The issue is their inefficiency. A post-quantum signature would take up 2000-3000 bytes, whereas current signatures are only 64 bytes;
it also costs 200,000 Gas on-chain versus the current 3000 Gas. Hence, there are two types of signatures we can use: one is hash-based, and the other is lattice-based signatures. Our idea is to increase vectorization, incorporating it into the EVM, essentially employing the same logic as making computers rapidly run artificial intelligence. We are actively working to make signatures quantum-resistant and more efficient.
State storage, account balances, and smart contract execution scalability are relatively easy, but storage scalability is relatively difficult, and there is much work to be done, we must strive in this area. So, this is all the short-term and long-term planning, and this is the direction in which we truly want Ethereum to develop. Ethereum is not meant to compete as a high-frequency trading platform, Ethereum is not meant to be the fastest chain; Ethereum aims to be a secure chain, a decentralized chain that will be online continuously and a chain you can always rely on.
So, one goal is to maximize security in consensus. Meaning that if the network is secure, it can withstand 49% node failure and can actually withstand almost all nodes going offline, thus possessing the same properties as btc-42">Bitcoin. Even if the network encounters issues, you can still maintain 33% security certainty. This is the first part.
The second part is all about formal verification. And we've been actively applying artificial intelligence to generate code proofs, proving that the Ethereum software version indeed possesses its intended features. We have made progress that was not possible two years ago. Artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing, so we are leveraging this to pursue ultimate simplicity, keep long-term protocols as simple as possible, and prepare as much as possible for the future.
Therefore, a network needs to be tested offline. If a network needs to be applied, you can rely on it even without a power socket available. Because this is actually the same principle that Bitcoin pursues. If you want to be a long-term holder, you need to ensure the security of your digital assets in the long term, relying on something that can continuously secure your assets, whose security does not depend on the continuous existence of a team or the continuous work of a team.
Ethereum's consensus combines the advantages of two approaches: the Bitcoin-style longest-chain rule and the BFT (Byzantine Fault Tolerance) method. This achieves finality, while also possessing optimal security features, quantum security, and fast finality.
Therefore, finality is achieved within one to three block slots, with chain finalization expected to take about 10-20 seconds, or even less. zkVM allows you to verify the chain without relying on a large computer to personally run all operations. Everyone should validate the chain before trusting it, even your phone and IoT devices should validate the chain. And the zkVM zero-knowledge virtual machine is fast enough to prove that real-time virtual machine execution is feasible. The goal this year is to make them secure enough to start using zkVM on a small scale, then gradually increase that scale. By 2028, this will enable it to scale up, process more transactions, all while maintaining decentralization.
What is the vision for these things? Ethereum is the world computer. It is both a global shared layer used to make commitments, publish data, record actions; a platform where data can be published, proof can be provided that data has been published, and proof that data has not yet been published, and it is open to everyone's use; it is also a global shared layer used to ensure the execution of high-value rules. Ethereum needs to be extremely robust and easy to verify. I believe that in the future, with artificial intelligence, it will actually become easier, simpler than we imagine, and truly ensure software security.
If you want to ensure software security, but people are unwilling to do so, software vulnerabilities will increase tenfold, and the number of attacks will increase tenfold as well. Therefore, Ethereum as a blockchain needs to first ensure security, followed by decentralization.
When these conditions are met, strive to provide this security to users as much as possible. Therefore, if you intend to build a decentralized application that ensures self-sovereignty, security, verifiability, and user participation—this includes financial, decentralized social, identity, and partially financial, partially non-financial applications (including ENS, prediction markets, etc.), covering a wide range of content. Ethereum can make app development easy, and this is the core goal by default.
The roadmap for the next four years is designed around this goal. Thank you!
Original Article Link
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

