ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?
Elon Musk once again lit up the meme coin market, bringing to the community a "Astro Doge" that surged nearly 10,000 times in just 3 days—$ASTEROID.
However, while this "Astro Doge" set off a frenzy in the ETH mainnet market, it also caused anxiety in the SOL trenches...
Space Dog $ASTEROID
ASTEROID was originally designed as a zero-gravity indicator for the 2024 SpaceX Polaris Dawn mission. It was turned into a plush toy that flew to space with astronauts, floating inside the cabin to indicate the onset of weightlessness.
Although ASTEROID is not a real dog, it can be said that it is the first "Shiba Inu" to enter space.
Liv Perrotto, the creator of ASTEROID, was a little girl herself. She hoped that ASTEROID would inspire all children to bravely pursue their dreams, saying, "Look, even a little Shiba Inu has entered space. When I grow up, I can definitely do it too." However, after battling bone cancer for 5 years, she tragically passed away on January 14 of this year.
Liv's biggest dream during her lifetime was to meet Musk. She even made a list of questions, preparing to get answers when she met Musk. After Liv's passing, her mother, Rebecca Perrotto, revealed the handwritten list of questions:

The final question on this list was, "Can you make ASTEROID SpaceX's mascot?"
On April 17, Musk replied to a tweet mentioning this by @glennbeck, saying, "Will answer later."

On April 19, Musk answered all the questions on the list, and regarding the question "Can you make ASTEROID SpaceX's mascot?" Musk's response was, "OK."

A typical Muskian narrative, with a grand vision—SpaceX's new mascot. But this time, the wealth effect did not occur on SOL, but rather on the ETH mainnet.
The $ASTEROID on the ETH mainnet started operating in September 2024, but after March 2025, its official Twitter account also fell into a less active state, with updates occurring roughly every few months. The official website linked in the Twitter bio is also no longer accessible.
They once airdropped 0.5% of the supply to St. Jude's Children's Research Hospital, the same recipient of all proceeds from the sale of the Asteroid Shiba plush toys by creator Liv Perrotto, to support pediatric cancer treatment. However, this was back in 2024.
Creator Liv Perrotto's mother, Rebecca Perrotto, claimed the 485.98 SOL transaction fee income from $ASTEROID on SOL. The token was launched via the Bags platform, and the total transaction fee income has now reached 856.46 SOL.
After receiving the transaction fee income, she did not publicly disclose this action on Twitter or any other social media platform, nor did she express any opinion on meme coins on ETH or SOL. In fact, her only statement regarding cryptocurrency is still somewhat unfriendly:

In response to a tweet about ETH $ASTEROID being listed on Aster, @AJamesMcCarthy stated that profiting from the creative design of a deceased little girl is deplorable. Rebecca Perrotto replied, "This is just so disheartening."
So, with an old and a new $ASTEROID, both have certain advantages from different perspectives. However, it cannot be said that the older one, the coin on the ETH mainnet, ultimately emerged as a "community success" because the CTO team had been inactive for over half a year before encountering this significant opportunity.
But there was something happening that made the SOL trenches anxious.
SOL Gets Drained
Wojak is a classic meme character familiar to meme enthusiasts. The $WOJAK on SOL slowly began to recover at the end of March, gradually rising from a $3 million market cap to a peak of $12 million.
However, all of this came to a halt on April 17 when Musk announced his response to Liv Perrotto's question. From April 17 onwards, $WOJAK on SOL has plummeted over 50%.

In contrast, $WOJAK on ETH surged by about 44% on April 17 and continued to rise over the following days, quickly jumping from a $6 million market cap to briefly hitting a $45 million market cap.

In just one day, the market cap lead of $WOJAK on SOL, which was about 10 times that of $WOJAK on ETH, was rapidly reversed.
The reversal of $WOJAK on SOL is seen as a concerning signal for players in the SOL trenches. Unlike native memes on SOL like $neet or memes with IP on SOL like $troll, both $WOJAK on ETH and SOL lack IP, and their competition is not only seen as a community vitality competition but also signifies a preference in capital allocation. Even though SOL has unaffected native and high-quality meme assets, and even $troll on SOL rose (albeit not as dramatically as $troll on ETH), such coins are few.
Will pump.fun Face Challenges?
Many English-speaking players believe that pump.fun's low-cost coin issuance no longer means "fair launch" but has turned into a race to see who can get 5% or more chips faster and cheaper. People reminisce about the days of buying a 0.x% chip and holding onto a shared dream of reaching a market cap of hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars.
While it is unknown if this sentiment will actually lead to a change in the SOL ecosystem, some launchpads have already attempted to challenge pump.fun using this sentiment.
The launchpad Printr, supported by Bybit, has introduced "Proof of Belief" where devs can enable this mode during coin issuance, distributing creator income to token stakers. Additionally, they can choose to automatically use creator income for buyback and burn or auto-add it to LP.
A trending new token issuance model experiment comes from @xbt2027, dubbed as "D27/D17," with its issuance of the main token $2027 on the ETH mainnet seeing a peak surge of approximately 15x.
Compared to the bonding curve, this model takes a much slower pace to play out and is divided into 5 stages:
- Stage 1: 10% of the total token supply is used for initial fundraising, similar to sending money to a wallet and waiting to receive tokens, but with a 100% refund option.
- Stages 2, 3, 4: Up to 5% of the total token supply is allocated, with the token valuation increasing compared to Stage 1 by 1.21x, 1.44x, and 1.69x, respectively. Refunds are still possible but not at a 100% rate, and the refund percentage for each stage depends on the fundraising status of the previous stage.
- Stage 5: If the fundraising amount does not reach the cap, the unsold tokens allocated in Stages 2, 3, 4 will be carried over to this stage. This stage also has a fixed sales quota of 5% of the total supply, and refunds are not available.
Through the sale, 20% of the tokens are sold across the 5 stages, while another 10% is locked in LP together with 90% of the sale funds. The remaining 10% of the sale funds are used to buy back $2027, and all remaining issued tokens will be burned.
The reason it is called an "experiment" is that this model has not yet been finalized through a smart contract to establish a fixed pattern and automated operation. Currently, there are 2 tokens that have completed fundraising through this experiment, $2027 issued on the ETH mainnet and $XBT, which is set to launch on SOL soon. $XBT has raised a total of 8146.349 SOL and will have its TGE on April 21 at 0:00.
This model is clearly designed to slow down, reward believers (with the highest cost of entry and refund flexibility in Stage 1), and address current issues such as early sniper attacks and poor liquidity in meme coins.
Although it is uncertain whether these new experiments or launchpads can alter the overly PvP nature of the SOL ecosystem, through the actions of these projects, we can sense that the current resentment towards PvP on SOL has grown so strong that project teams believe they can attract users by leveraging emotions to break through. Perhaps, the SOL ecosystem will indeed see some changes. Perhaps, pump.fun is also feeling anxious.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.
