Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Web3 New Tale of Two Cities: Stablecoins and Money Market Funds
Original Article Title: Stablecoins and the parallels with Money Market Funds
Original Article Authors: @shawnwlim, @artichokecap Founders
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: The regulatory dispute over stablecoins bears resemblance to the experience of Money Market Funds (MMFs) half a century ago. MMFs were initially designed for corporate cash management but faced criticism due to lack of deposit insurance and vulnerability to runs, impacting bank stability and monetary policy. Nevertheless, MMF assets now exceed $7.2 trillion. The 2008 financial crisis led to the collapse of the Reserve Fund, and in 2023, the SEC is still pushing for MMF regulatory reform. The history of MMFs suggests that stablecoins may face similar regulatory challenges but could ultimately become a crucial part of the financial system.
The following is the original content (slightly edited for readability):
Stablecoins are exciting, and the upcoming stablecoin legislation in the US represents a rare opportunity to upgrade the existing financial system. Those studying financial history will notice parallels between it and the invention and development of Money Market Funds about half a century ago.
Money Market Funds were invented in the 1970s as a cash management solution, primarily for corporates. At that time, US banks were prohibited from paying interest on balances in checking accounts, and corporations were often unable to maintain savings accounts. If a business wanted to earn interest on idle cash, they had to buy US Treasuries, engage in repurchase agreements, invest in commercial paper, or certificates of deposit. Managing cash was a cumbersome and operationally intensive process.
The design of Money Market Funds was to maintain a stable share value, with each share pegged at $1. The Reserve Fund, Inc. was the first MMF. Launched in 1971, it was introduced as "a convenient alternative for investing temporary cash balances," which would typically be placed in money market instruments like Treasuries, commercial paper, bank acceptances, or CDs, with an initial asset size of $1 million.
Other investment giants quickly followed suit: Dreyfus (now part of BNYglobal), Fidelity, Vanguard_Group. In the 1980s, almost half of Vanguard's legendary mutual fund business growth was attributable to its Money Market Fund.
During his tenure as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987, Paul Volcker was highly critical of Money Market Funds (MMFs). He continued his criticism of MMFs as late as 2011.
Today, many of the criticisms raised by policymakers against stablecoins echo those from half a century ago against Money Market Funds:
· Systemic Risk and Banking Safety Concerns: MMFs lack deposit insurance and a lender of last resort mechanism, unlike insured banks. Because of this, MMFs are susceptible to rapid runs, which could exacerbate financial instability and lead to contagion. There are also concerns that deposits shifting from insured banks to MMFs could weaken the banking sector as banks lose their low-cost and stable deposit base.
· Unfair Regulatory Arbitrage: MMFs provide bank-like services, maintaining a stable $1 share price, but without rigorous regulatory oversight or capital requirements.
· Weakening of Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism: MMFs could weaken the Fed's monetary policy tools, as traditional monetary policy instruments like bank reserves are less effective when funds flow from banks to MMFs.
Today, MMFs have financial assets exceeding $7.2 trillion. For reference, M2 (excluding MMF assets) is $21.7 trillion.
In the late 1990s, the rapid growth in MMF assets was a result of financial deregulation (the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, fueling a wave of financial innovation), while the prosperity of the internet facilitated better electronic and online trading systems, speeding up fund inflows into MMFs.
Do you see a pattern here? (I would like to point out that even half a century later, the regulatory struggle around MMFs is far from over. The SEC adopted MMF reforms in 2023, including raising minimum liquidity requirements and removing fund manager restrictions on investor redemptions.)
Unfortunately, the Reserve Fund met its end after the 2008 financial crisis. It held some Lehman Brothers debt securities, which were written down to zero, leading to the fund's breaking of the buck event and significant redemptions.
You may also like
Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution
Prediction Markets Under Bias
Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?
ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?
ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy
Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?
Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion
Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?
Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?
An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago
Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.
$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world
Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap
On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?
Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?
After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?
ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?
App