A 7 year Ledger bug lets attackers rebuild a private key from five signatures in seconds
Zilliqa has suspended native transactions after discovering that roughly five affected signatures from the same private key may provide enough information to reconstruct that key, creating a recovery problem that an ordinary transfer cannot safely solve.
The vulnerability is confined to Schnorr signatures generated for native, non-EVM transactions through the Zilliqa Ledger app, according to the network's security disclosure. Zilliqa said every version of the app released between 2019 and 2026 contained the flaw.
Zilliqa said it detected on-chain activity consistent with active exploitation on July 19 and confirmed the root cause on July 21. The disclosure did not identify affected addresses or quantify any losses.
Public signatures can expose the private key
The flaw occurred while the Ledger app generated the ephemeral nonce required for each native Zilliqa signature. The signing routine generated 40 bytes of randomness and reduced the result modulo the secp256k1 curve order, but then copied the wrong 32-byte range into the nonce buffer.
That operation retained eight zero-padding bytes while discarding eight bytes of actual entropy, fixing the nonce's highest 64 bits at zero and leaving each value below 2^192^.
Zilliqa said an attacker can combine approximately five affected signatures produced by the same private key and use lattice-reduction techniques to reconstruct that key within seconds on commodity hardware.
Any account that has broadcast approximately five or more native transactions signed through the Zilliqa Ledger app should therefore be considered compromised, according to Zilliqa. The weakened signatures remain permanently available on-chain, so updating the app cannot remove the information already exposed. Affected private keys must ultimately be retired.
Zilliqa credited KuCoin with reporting the incident and helping confirm the vulnerability. According to the disclosure, the exchange recovered affected private keys using publicly available signatures and assisted in tracing the problem to the app's nonce-generation code.
A normal rescue transfer could be front-run
Moving assets to a new address once native transactions resume carries another risk. An attacker who has already reconstructed the private key can also sign a valid transaction and attempt to front-run the legitimate holder's transfer.
This leaves Zilliqa balancing two requirements before reopening native activity: allowing legitimate users to migrate their assets while preventing attackers with the same signing authority from winning the transaction race.
The network said it was finalizing a coordinated remediation plan and advised anyone who has signed native Zilliqa transactions with a Ledger device to await official instructions before taking action.
Zilliqa suspended native, non-EVM transactions as a protective measure after identifying the vulnerability. The project said the pause halted further draining of affected accounts.
At publication time, Zilliqa had not announced a reopening date or published its final migration procedure through its official channels.
A corrected version of the Ledger app is being prepared in coordination with Ledger and will restore full-width nonce generation. The update can prevent future signatures from exposing the same information, but it cannot secure keys compromised by signatures already recorded on-chain. Zilliqa said release details would be announced separately.
EVM and official SDK signing paths are unaffected
The disclosure does not describe a compromise of Ledger hardware generally. Zilliqa attributed the vulnerability to its Ledger app's implementation of native transaction signing.
Zilliqa said EVM transactions are unaffected. The nonce-generation paths used by its official zilliqa-js, gozilliqa-sdk, and pyzil software development kits also fall outside the disclosed vulnerability.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Ripple partners with DriveWealth for RLUSD settlement and global payments

Starting a Business with Crypto Payments: What Changes in 2027

Bitwise Reports Strong Growth in Crypto Market in Q3

The Uncomfortable Truth Behind 90% of AI Payments

Hardcore Guide: How to Turn Your iPhone into a Secure Cold Wallet?

Crypto Billionaires Invest $100 Million to Disrupt UK Politics

Wells Fargo prepares for stablecoins as CEO questions US use cases

Privy Integrates with XRP Ledger, Supporting XRPL Wallet Integration

Next Bull Run: The 4 Cryptos That Bitwise's CIO Refuses to Let Go

A Hole Punctured by a Dealer: A $100 Liability Cap Cannot Cover a $90 Million Loss

Is Crypto in a Bear Market in 2026? 7 Indicators to Watch

Veteran of Shiba Inu Community Exposes Fake Airdrop Scam! Warning Against Methods Targeting Cryptocurrency Wallets

Polygon OMS Launches Automated Stablecoin Payment Feature

a16z Rethinks KYC: Institutions Embrace On-Chain Without Being Stuck in Traditional KYC Frameworks

Bitcoin and Fed: U.S. Hiring Falls to Lowest Level Since 2011

BCE Insider Reveals the Plan Behind the Debt Crisis in Europe

Clear signing: Cyfrin identifies hidden fields

Lightning Development Kit Releases Security Update to Fix Fund Theft Vulnerability

Ledger Wallets Drained of an Estimated $86 Million: Is Your Ledger Safe After the CryptoBilis Thefts?
Ledger confirmed an unauthorized hardware implant in a device sold through the reseller CryptoBilis, after on-chain analysts traced an estimated $72 million to $93 million in thefts. Ledger says its own systems and direct sales were not compromised. Whether a Ledger is safe depends mainly on where it was bought.
![[ETH Letter] 'Next Upgrade' Glaemsterdam Activates Sepolia Testnet](/public-static/075_ade8940e45.png?format=avif)
[ETH Letter] 'Next Upgrade' Glaemsterdam Activates Sepolia Testnet

How to Safeguard Your Tokens in the AI Era?

Zhao Changpeng Raises Suspicions of Hackers Acquiring Hardware Wallet Vendor

Binance founder describes Ledger hack as movie-like tactic

Ledger, Coldcard... Are hardware wallets still safe in 2026?

Five On-Chain Bitcoin Indicators Turn Bullish Simultaneously

Cryptography Doomsday Warning: How Should Blockchain Save Itself When AI Targets Your Private Keys?

Liquidity Trap After TGE: How Can Project Teams Restructure Market Making Strategies and Order Book Defense Amidst the Wave of Star Token Price Drops?

Severe Criticism from the Senate of the U.S. Treasury Buyback Policy; An Intervention That Backfired

Cryptocurrencies, Children from Uganda, and an Accusation Shaking Flavio Bolsonaro's Campaign











