Berachain has been exposed to have signed a Term Sheet with a Venture Capital firm, allowing the lead investor to make a risk-free investment.
According to Unchained, Layer 1 project Berachain reportedly granted one of its lead investors in the latest B-round funding, hedge fund Brevan Howard's Nova Digital fund, an extremely rare "risk-free" investment clause. The agreement reveals that Nova Digital fund has the unconditional right to request the return of its $25 million investment principal within one year after the Token Generation Event (TGE) of the project.
This disclosure of the special clause comes at a time when Berachain's token BERA has been underperforming in the market, sparking intense questioning from the crypto community and other investment firms regarding the fairness of the project's funding.
Risk-Free Privilege in Venture Capital
Berachain has raised a total of at least $142 million, with its token reaching a valuation of up to $1.5 billion in the B-round funding. This round of funding was co-led by Framework Ventures and Nova Digital fund. However, leaked documents show that Brevan Howard's Nova Digital fund has gained the right to exercise the refund "within the longest one year after the TGE on February 6, 2025."
The financial logic behind this clause is clear and highly skewed: if the BERA token performs well, Nova Digital fund can enjoy substantial returns; however, if the token price falls, the fund can demand a full refund, essentially providing a zero-risk guarantee for its $25 million principal.
Reportedly, a former Berachain employee recalled that the co-founder "Papa Bear" once indicated that Brevan Howard's participation was aimed at enhancing the project's legitimacy. However, other institutions that also participated in the B-round funding, including Framework Ventures, Arrington Capital, Hack VC, Polychain, and Tribe Capital, allegedly were not informed of the existence of this side agreement. Against the backdrop of the BERA token price dropping from $3 at the time of investment to around $1 (a decrease of about 67%), Framework Ventures is facing a loss of over $50 million.
Imminent Potential Repayment Pressure and Legal Disputes
Based on the current price of the BERA token (a decrease of about 66% from the $3 investment price), the Nova Digital fund exercising its refund right aligns with its financial interests. If the fund chooses to exercise this right before the deadline on February 6, 2026, Berachain's fund will face significant financial pressure to raise $25 million in cash to repay the investor. The project documents indicate that the tokens purchased by Berachain investors have a one-year lock-up period, and if Nova Digital exercises the refund right, it may need to forfeit its BERA token allocation.
Currently, the legality of this particular agreement is still in question, especially due to the "secret" terms signed without the knowledge of other investors.
The exposure of this event immediately caused a strong backlash in the crypto community, with community comments largely focusing on the anger towards "lack of transparency" and "institutional vs. retail asymmetry."
Berachain co-founder Smokey the Bera responded on social media, stating that the report was "neither accurate nor complete."
You may also like

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight
Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.
